What is the difference between the Classical concept of full employment and Keynesian concept of full employment

475 views

I am having a hard time on understanding the concept. I have minimal knowledge on economics and I am seeking here for an explanation about this. Thank you people.

In: Economics

4 Answers

Anonymous 0 Comments

It’s hard to give an ELI5 answer, because that difference is somewhat the whole point of Keynesian economics. Moreover, “Keynesian” can mean a lot of different things–what Keynes said, the historical Keynesian school, Post-Keynesians, Neo-Keynesians, and I’m probably missing some. And of these, the Neo-Keynesian flavor is the only one somewhat consistently taught in economics programs.

My stab at it: full employment is always “all people who are willing to work at the current market salary have a job”, the difference is whether or not the market gets there on its own.

In classical economics, anyone who wants a job at the current market salary can get one. If anyone doesn’t have a job, it’s because they don’t want to work at the current market salary (i.e. they are voluntarily unemployed).

Keynes went “dude, just take a look out there, people can’t find jobs and that’s not because they’re too greedy or lazy”. His theory is that demand drives the economy and therefore full employment often requires that the government boosts the demand; otherwise, you have involuntary unemployment.

Anonymous 0 Comments

In classical economics full employment is a long run equilibrium between supply and demand and is basically independent of policy.
Keynesian full employment is the level of employment where additional demand side measure (ie the government buying stuff) will drive up prices but not employ more people.
Policy wise this is important: Keynes says that the government has a role pushing the economy to full employment, classical theory does not.

Anonymous 0 Comments

I’ll also throw “structural un-employment” which is primarily made up of the time required for job seekers get aligned optimally with jobs. Could be the job search process, could be moving for a better job, could be required gaps between jobs (like garden leave).

Anonymous 0 Comments

In classical full employment, everyone has a job. In Keynesian full employment, everyone who wants a job has a job. If someone is moving from a Walmart stocker to spaceX engineer, it’s probably a good thing that they were unemployed for a month.